Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

routing_over_manet:on_the_performance_of_ad_hoc_routing_protocols_under_a_peer-to-peer_application [2012/04/28 23:48]
julia
routing_over_manet:on_the_performance_of_ad_hoc_routing_protocols_under_a_peer-to-peer_application [2012/04/28 23:50] (current)
julia
Line 37: Line 37:
   * // Network density. // The heaviest protocol to the system was DSDV, in terms of Number of Packets in the system for increasing number of the Nodes.   * // Network density. // The heaviest protocol to the system was DSDV, in terms of Number of Packets in the system for increasing number of the Nodes.
   * // Peer quantity. // Consistently for the DSR protocol, number of hops for any number of pers in the system was great than in others protocols. In term of consumed energy, AODV showed the best results for any number of peer in the system.   * // Peer quantity. // Consistently for the DSR protocol, number of hops for any number of pers in the system was great than in others protocols. In term of consumed energy, AODV showed the best results for any number of peer in the system.
 +
 +The result of the work showed that it's important at first define metrics and only then choose and commit any protocol.
 +
 +Future work is considered to be focused on possible changes to protocols or proposal of a new one.
  
routing_over_manet/on_the_performance_of_ad_hoc_routing_protocols_under_a_peer-to-peer_application.txt · Last modified: 2012/04/28 23:50 by julia
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki